You have designed a visual analytics workflow for a specific task, and identified the library workflows that informed each phase of your design. I am now uploading the source papers that describe those library workflows in full detail. Your task in this second stage is not to redesign the workflow — the structural design you produced remains fixed — but to enrich it with method-level detail drawn from the source papers.

Specifically, please review the workflow you designed and identify, for each phase or step, the specific methodological choices that an analyst implementing this workflow would need to make. Where the source papers describe relevant methods, parameter ranges, algorithm variants, validation approaches, or implementation techniques, please note them alongside the corresponding phase.

Please present the result as a table with the following columns: phase or step of your workflow, the analytical purpose of that step, the specific methods or approaches recommended for implementing it, the source paper(s) from which each recommendation is drawn, and any parameter ranges or validation considerations mentioned in the source. But you may use another format if it better fits the level of detail you can extract from the papers.

If any of the source papers describe methods that would substantially improve the workflow but require changes to its structure, please note these separately as "possible refinements to the workflow structure" without incorporating them into the workflow design itself. This lets me see whether the source-paper consultation would motivate structural changes without conflating them with method enrichment.

The goal of this stage is to produce an implementation-ready version of the workflow, where an analyst reading it would have both the structural design (from your original recommendation) and the methodological detail (from the source papers) needed to actually carry out the analysis.